Central Nervous System Metastases Research Articles

Abstract PO5-06-01: Loss of hormone receptor expression in breast cancer is associated with increased brain tropism and accelerated progression of leptomeningeal disease

Abstract The four breast cancer subtypes—luminal A, luminal B, HER2-overexpressing, and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) – are classified based on gene expression profiles of hormone receptors (HRs) (estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR)) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2/ERBB2). Negative hormone receptor status is known to be associated with more aggressive breast cancer. Compared to other breast cancer subtypes, the HR-negative TNBC and HER2-overexpressing subtypes are characterized by high rates of recurrence and a notable increase in brain metastases and in particular, leptomeningeal disease (LMD). LMD – the most aggressive form of central nervous system (CNS) metastasis, in which cancer cells infiltrate leptomeninges of the brain and spine – carries a dismal prognosis due to a rapid progression, poor detection, and no effective treatment. Several studies that investigated the link between HR status and LMD suggest that HR-negative breast cancers have a shorter time to LMD diagnosis. This shortened timeline is consistent with higher migratory capabilities reported for TNBC and HER2 breast cancer cells. However, as it is known that breast cancers exhibit subtype-specific metastatic tropism (i.e., luminal subtypes tend to metastasize to bone and liver, while TNBCs metastasize to the CNS), the longer time between primary breast cancer diagnosis and LMD diagnosis for HR-positive breast cancers may also reflect a longer metastatic route that first includes a non-CNS location. In this study, we performed a retrospective analysis on 141 breast cancer patients with LMD treated at Stanford Hospital between 2008-2020. The Stanford LMD cohort was analyzed using linear regression analysis, Cox regression analysis, and Chi-squared analysis. HR status was recorded (when available) for local recurrences and distant metastases, and was included in our regression models as a time-dependent HR covariate. We tested if: (1) HR-negative breast cancers had shorter time between primary and LMD diagnosis as well as worse survival after LMD diagnosis versus HR-positive breast cancers, and if (2) HR loss (i.e., HR status changing from positive to negative) increased likelihood of the metastasis to CNS. In agreement with published studies, the Stanford LMD cohort showed that HR-negative cancers had shorter time to development of LMD (p = 0.0004 for ER, p = 0.0001 for PR) and increased mortality following LMD (p = 0.010 for ER, p = 0.009 for PR). We found that HR-negative status at primary breast cancer diagnosis increased risk of first metastasis to CNS versus non-CNS locations (p = 0.021 for ER, p = 0.043 for PR). HR status switch (also known as hormone discordance) between primary diagnosis and metastasis occurred in 15% of patients in Stanford cohort, consistent with other studies. Importantly, accounting for HR status switch strengthened the association between HR-negative status and the risk of CNS metastasis [Hazard Ratio = 2.506 (1.395 - 4.500) for “baseline ER status” versus Hazard Ratio = 3.509 (1.890 - 6.515) for “time-dependent ER status”, Hazard Ratio = 2.420 (1.310 - 4.471) for “baseline PR status” versus Hazard Ratio = 3.407 (1.815 - 6.395) for “time-dependent PR status”]. In conclusion, HR-negative status was associated with shorter time to development of LMD, higher CNS tropism, and shorter survival following LMD diagnosis. Taking into consideration hormone discordance between the primary tumor and metastatic sites strengthened this association. Our results suggest a potential value in testing HR status at all recurrences and advanced CNS monitoring following HR loss. Citation Format: Sophia Pribus, Maxine C. Umeh-Garcia, Bo Gu, Bryanna Godfrey, Summer Han, Sophia Chernikova, Melanie Hayden Gephart. Loss of hormone receptor expression in breast cancer is associated with increased brain tropism and accelerated progression of leptomeningeal disease [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO5-06-01.

Abstract PO1-01-06: Patterns in use and tolerance of adjuvant neratinib in patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive, HER2-positive early-stage breast cancer

Abstract Background: In the ExteNET study, 1 year of neratinib therapy was shown to derive a significant invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) benefit in HR+, HER2+, node-positive disease after trastuzumab-based adjuvant therapy. Currently, the NCCN guidelines recommend extended adjuvant neratinib following trastuzumab-based therapy for patients (pts) with high-risk HR+ HER2+ disease. Limitations to use of neratinib include significant gastrointestinal side effects which often result in pts discontinuing treatment. In this study, we aimed to identify high-risk clinical features and characteristics of pts who were offered adjuvant neratinib therapy and factors that impacted treatment completion versus discontinuation. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of all pts with early-stage HR+ HER2+ breast cancer who were prescribed neratinib from 2017-2023 at our institution. We used the electronic medical record to extract information on patient characteristics, clinical and high-risk features. High-risk was defined as any of the following: at least 4 lymph nodes positive for disease, 1-3 lymph nodes positive for disease and a grade 3 (poorly differentiated) tumor, tumor > 5 cm, or Ki67 > 20%. Length of time on treatment, treatment holds, dose reductions and up-titrations were documented. Statistical analysis was performed using two-sided T-tests and chi-square tests. Results: We identified 62 eligible pts of whom 34 (55%) completed 1 year of neratinib and 28 (45%) did not. Median age at diagnosis was 51.5 years. 49% of pts were pre-menopausal at diagnosis, 43% were post-menopausal, 5% were peri-menopausal and 3% had undocumented menopausal status at diagnosis. Clinical features of the pts are documented in Table 1. Sixty percent of patients offered neratinib were considered high-risk at diagnosis, based on definitions described above. 73% of pts received neoadjuvant treatment with pertuzumab in addition to trastuzumab. 24 pts (39%) had residual disease and 22 pts (35%) received adjuvant T-DM1. The most common reason for neratinib discontinuation was inability to tolerate side effects (54%) followed by pill burden (18%). The most common side effect experienced by pts was diarrhea despite anti-diarrheal prophylaxis (56%), followed by rash (8%). Pts who received an up-titration of neratinib were more likely to complete the full course of neratinib when compared to those who did not (76% vs. 40.5% p = 0.013). The median starting dose of those who completed neratinib treatment was 140 mg vs. 240 mg in those who did not (p = 0.016). The median length of time on neratinib for those that did not complete the 1-year treatment course was 30 days. Neither group experienced a statistically significant greater likelihood of treatment holds or dose reductions. In terms of outcomes, 10 pts had progression of disease of whom 7 did not complete neratinib treatment (p = 0.169). Interestingly, those 7 pts developed metastatic disease and 57% had central nervous system metastases. Conclusions: Pts are more likely to complete 1 year of adjuvant neratinib with dose up-titration. Dose reductions and interruptions did not affect neratinib adherence in our patient population. Seven pts in our study developed metastatic disease, all of whom did not complete adjuvant neratinib treatment. Future prospective studies are needed to further determine the impact of adjuvant neratinib treatment on iDFS in pts who have received pertuzumab and/or T-DM1. Table 1: Clinical Features of Patients Prescribed Neratinib Citation Format: Julia Blanter, Elena Baldwin, Rima Patel, Tianxiang Sheng, Amy Tiersten. Patterns in use and tolerance of adjuvant neratinib in patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive, HER2-positive early-stage breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO1-01-06.

Abstract PS08-04: Multicenter retrospective cohort study of the sequential use of the antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) and sacituzumab govitecan (SG) in patients with HER2-low metastatic breast cancer (MBC)

Abstract Introduction. T-DXd is FDA-approved for patients (pts) with hormone receptor positive (HR+) or HR- HER2-low (IHC 1+ or 2+, ISH-) MBC and SG is FDA-approved for pts with HR+/HER2- and triple negative MBC. However, several outstanding questions impact the use of these drugs in clinic, including: 1) what is the efficacy and safety of these agents in real-world populations with diverse pt characteristics not well represented in the pivotal phase III trials, and 2) what is the impact of sequential treatment with ADCs on the efficacy and safety of these agents. Methods. In this multicenter retrospective cohort study, we identified pts with HR+/HER2-low and HR-/HER2-low MBC who had received both T-DXd and SG monotherapy (in either order, with or without intervening therapies) treated at 5 academic centers between 2020-2023. Pts received treatment per standard of care or on a clinical trial with ADC monotherapy. We describe pt demographic and clinical characteristics, treatment history, key safety parameters, and response and survival data by HR+ status and ADC sequence order. Results. Sixty pts with MBC treated sequentially with T-DXd and SG were included in this analysis, including 45 pts with HR+/HER2-low MBC (75.0%) and 15 pts with HR-/HER2-low MBC (25.0%). Most pts were female (n=59; 98.3%), non-Hispanic (n=49, 81.7%), and white (n=43, 71.7%). Median age at start of ADC #1 was 56.6 years (range 23-82). Prior to treatment with ADC #1, most pts had visceral disease (n=45, 75.0%) and 16 (26.7%) had central nervous system metastases. Among pts with HR+/HER2-low MBC, median time from MBC diagnosis to treatment with ADC #1 was 49.0 months, with 4 median lines of prior therapy in the metastatic setting (2 endocrine, 2 chemo). Approximately half of the HR+ pts received T-DXd prior to SG (n=22, 48.9%; median 3.0 prior lines of therapy for MBC, range 1-9) while the other half received SG prior to T-DXd (n=23, 51.1%; median 4.5 prior lines of therapy for MBC, range 1-10). 44% (n=20) received an intervening therapy between ADCs. For HR+ pts who received T-DXd prior to SG, response and survival data is as follows for T-DXd and SG respectively: Overall response rate (ORR) [54.5% and 21.1%], time to next treatment (TTNT) [4.3 mo and 1.6 mo], and real-world overall survival (rwOS) [19.8 mo and 4.9 mo]. For HR+ pts who received SG prior to T-DXd, response and survival data is as follows for SG and T-DXd respectively: ORR [78.3% and 42.9%], TTNT [8.6 mo and 2.8 mo], and rwOS [22.3 mo and 7.3 mo]. Among pts with HR-/HER2-low MBC, median time from MBC diagnosis to treatment with ADC #1 was 8.2 months with 2 median lines of prior therapy in the metastatic setting (2 chemotherapy); 66.7% (n=10) received prior immunotherapy. Most HR- pts received SG prior to T-DXD (n=14, 93.3%) and 40.0% (n=6) received an intervening therapy between ADCs. For HR- pts who received SG prior to T-DXd, response and survival data is as follows for SG and T-DXd respectively: ORR [64.3% and 38.5%], TTNT [6.2 mo and 2.7 mo, and rwOS [15.7 mo and 6.5 mo]. In terms of key safety parameters during treatment with T-DXd, 13.3% of pts (8/60) required a dose reduction. 16.7% (10/60) were diagnosed with interstitial lung disease (ILD)/pneumonitis of any grade including 3 pts with grade 3-4 ILD (5.0%) and 3 pts with grade 5 ILD (5.0%). During treatment with SG, 40.0% of pts (24/60) required a dose reduction. 83.3% (50/60) received growth factor support (24 pts primary prophylaxis; 26 pts secondary prophylaxis); 9 pts (15%) required treatment delay due to neutropenia. Conclusion. This study represents the largest multicenter series to date of pts treated with sequential ADCs for HR+/HER2-low or HR-/HER2-low. ORR was higher and TTNT was longer for ADC #1 than ADC #2 in all subgroups, regardless of HR+ status and ADC sequence order. An additional ~30 pts will be reported at time of final analysis. Future prospective studies are planned to further clarify the efficacy and safety of sequential ADC use and to identify biomarkers of response and resistance. Key demographic, clinical and treatment characteristics in pts with HR+ and HR- HER2-low MBC treated sequentially with T-DXd and SG (in either order, with or without intervening therapies) Abbreviations: T-DXd (trastuzumab deruxtecan), SG (sacituzumab govitecan), MBC (metastatic breast cancer), ADC (antibody drug conjugate), HR (hormone receptor), HER2 (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2), CNS (central nervous system), ET (endocrine therapy), ORR (overall response rate), TTNT (time to next treatment), rwOS (real world overall survival), CI (confidence interval) * Several pts on ADC #2 with ongoing treatment and first scan pending, hence smaller denominator for response assessment Citation Format: Laura Huppert, Reshma Mahtani, Samantha Fisch, Naomi Dempsey, Sarah Premji, Angelina Raimonde-Taylor, Saya Jacob, Laura Quintal, Jo Chien, Michelle Melisko, Ana Sandoval-Leon, Lauren Carcas, Manmeet Ahluwalia, Natasha Harpalani, Jenna Hoppenworth, Dame Idossa, Ruta Rao, Karthik Giridhar, Hope Rugo. Multicenter retrospective cohort study of the sequential use of the antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) and sacituzumab govitecan (SG) in patients with HER2-low metastatic breast cancer (MBC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PS08-04.

Abstract PO2-05-13: HER2 status presented an unstable switching from primary to recurrent breast cancer

Abstract Background: Breast cancer patients with HER2-2+ expression had heterogeneous characteristic. Treatment decision is of great importance after progression. Objective: We explored patients with HER2-2+ in matched primary or recurrent/metastatic tumor samples from January 2010 to June 2022 in our institute were included to evaluate the evolution from or to HER2-2+ expression. Meanwhile, with an emerging of novel entity as HER2-low expression breast cancer, we included this category when analysis as well. Results: In the cohort of a total of 159 breast cancer patients with HER2-2+ expression in either primary tumor or locoregional/distant metastases samples, HER2-2+ breast cancer accounted for 44.0% in primary tumor and 88.8% in recurrent diseases. There were 18.5% and 15.2% patients with HER2 gene amplification on ISH assay among primary and recurrent/metastatic HER2-2+ breast cancers, respectively. The overall rate of HER2 IHC discordance was 67.1%. Among primary HER2-2+ cases, 74.6% maintained in HER2-2+ when disease relapsed. Discordance was mostly driven by cases switching from HER2-2+ to HER2-1+ (64.7%). In HER2-2+ recurrent/metastatic cases, discordance was mostly driven by cases switching from HER2-0 to HER2-2+ (47.1%). The proportion of HER2 discordant cases got a higher statistically trend among HR-positive patients in compared with HR-negative patients (44.1% vs. 21.7%, p = 0.062). There were 35.0% in primary HR-positive/HER2-negative patients and 11.8% in primary triple-negative patients switching from HER2-0 to HER2-low when disease progressed, respectively. Meanwhile, HER2 discordance rate had a significant difference across different metastatic sites (p = 0.026). All contralateral breast and skin metastasis presented with discordant HER2 results. While, all central nervous system metastasis maintained the same HER2-low expression. HER2-positive phenotype in primary breast cancer samples loss their positivity in 42.1% cases. There was a total of 6.6% cases gained HER2 positivity in recurrent breast cancer samples. Conclusion: HER2 expression from primary to relapse breast cancer samples were highly unstable. Biopsy of recurrent sites was necessary to find novel treatment. Citation Format: Anjie Zhu, Hui-Ping Li. HER2 status presented an unstable switching from primary to recurrent breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO2-05-13.

Abstract PO5-04-01: Inetetamab combined with sirolimus and chemotherapy in HER2 positive metastatic breast cancer patients with abnormal activation of Pi3k/Akt/mTOR pathway after trastuzumab treatment

Abstract Objective: To explore the efficacy and safety of Inetetamab Combined with Sirolimus and Chemotherapy in the treatment of human epidermal factor receptor 2 (HER2) positive metastatic breast cancer patients with abnormal activation of Pi3k/Akt/mTOR (PAM) pathway after Trastuzumab treatment. Methods: This prospective multicenter clinical study enrolled HER2 positive metastatic breast cancer patients at the National Cancer Center in China from July 2021 to September 2022 with PAM pathway mutation confirmed by histology or peripheral blood genetic testing. The inclusion criteria included: 1) Recurrent and metastatic breast cancer patients with HER2 positive confirmed histologically; 2) ECOG PS score ≤ 2; 3) Patients who have progressed after previous treatment with Trastuzumab; 4) Patients with PAM pathway mutation confirmed by Genetic testing; 5) Patients' cardiac, pulmonary, liver and bone marrow functions are basically normal; 6) Patients voluntarily sign informed consent forms. The exclusion criteria included: 1) Patients previously treated with mTOR inhibitors or pyrotinib; 2) Patients who have used chronic Corticosteroid for more than 3 months or used Immunosuppressive drug within 4 weeks; 3) Patients with symptomatic central nervous system metastasis; 4) Patients with left ventricular Ejection fraction< 50% or clinical manifestations of obvious arrhythmia, myocardial ischemia, severe atrioventricular block, cardiac insufficiency, and severe valvular disease; 5)Diagnosed with other malignant tumors within five years. Patients were randomly divided into trial group and control group. The patients in the trial group received inetetamab combined with sirolimus and chemotherapy, and control group received pyrotinib and chemotherapy. RECISTv1.1 standard was used to evaluate the efficacy of patients. Descriptive statistics are used to summarize clinical pathological features. Kaplan Meier method was used to draw survival curves. Log-rank test was used to compare progression free survival (PFS) differences between groups. P< 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results:A total of 59 HER2 positive metastatic breast cancer patients with abnormal activation of PAM pathway were included, of which 37 patients received the treatment of inetetamab group and 22 patients received the treatment of pyrotinib group. The median follow-up time was 5.33 months. In the intent-to-treat set, the median PFS of patients in the inetetamab group was 4.64 months, which was shorter than 5.69 months in the pyrotinib group. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (P=0.51; HR=0.41; 95% CI, 0.12-1.45). The objective response rate (ORR) of the inetetamab group and the pyrotinib group were 28.1% and 29.4%, respectively. In terms of safety, the incidence of adverse events (AE) in the experimental group was (33/37) 89.1%, while (16/21) 76.2% in the control group. The incidence of AE above level 3 in the inetetamab group and pyrotinib group were (13/37) 35.1% and (3/21) 14.3%, respectively. Conclusion:For the metastatic HER2 positive breast cancer patients with abnormal activation of PAM pathway treated with trastuzumab previously, the combination of inetetamab with sirolimus and chemotherapy regimen are equivalent to the combination of pyrotinib and chemotherapy regimen. It demonstrated that combination of inetetamab with sirolimus and chemotherapy could be one of the treatment options for the metastatic HER2 positive breast cancer patients. Citation Format: Qiao Li, Dan Lv, Xiaoying Sun, Mengyuan Wang, Li Cai, Feng Liu, Chenghui Li, Jiuda Zhao, Jing Sun, Yehui Shi, Fei Ma. Inetetamab combined with sirolimus and chemotherapy in HER2 positive metastatic breast cancer patients with abnormal activation of Pi3k/Akt/mTOR pathway after trastuzumab treatment [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO5-04-01.

SMARCA4-deficient central nervous system metastases: A case series and systematic review.

SMARCA4 alterations can be encountered in a variety of human neoplasms, and metastases to the central nervous system (CNS) are rare, offering a challenge to neuropathologists despite not representing a distinct diagnostic entity. To better understand the clinical and histologic presentation of such neoplasms, we report an observational case series and systematic review of 178 unique articles that yielded 15 published cases and 7 cases from institutional files. In the systematic review, the median age was 58 years, the male-to-female ratio was 2:1, and the most common diagnosis was lung adenocarcinoma; all CNS metastases were discovered within 1 year of presentation. In the case series, the median age was 58 years, the male-to-female ratio was 6:1, and all known metastases originated from the lung. Most patients had a smoking history and died of disease. GATA-3 positivity was seen in most case series examples. Concurrent TP53 mutations (83.3%) and a high tumor mutation rate (60%) were common. To our knowledge, this is the only case series and systematic review in the English literature aimed at assessing SMARCA4-altered metastases in the CNS and vertebral column. We highlight the challenges of neuropathologic evaluation of such tumors and provide observational evidence of early metastases, histologic appearances, and immunohistochemical findings, including previously unreported GATA-3 positivity.

Abstract CT204: Efficacy of Bria-IMT regimen in inducing CNS metastasis regression

Abstract Objectives: Breast cancer metastasis to the central nervous system (CNS) often leads to severe morbidity and mortality, and while systemic treatments manage primary tumors, their impact on CNS metastases is limited. This retrospective analysis evaluates the efficacy of Bria-IMT as a monotherapy or in combination with an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) on CNS tumor regression.      Methods: Post-hoc analysis of a subset of advanced MBC patients with CNS metastases from previous phase 1 and 2, and ongoing randomized phase 2 trials involving SV-BR-1-GM. SV-BR-1-GM is a GM-CSF secreting, antigen-presenting immortalized breast cancer cell line. Bria-IMT (SV-BR-1-GM ~20x106 cells, intradermally 48-72 hours after cyclophosphamide 300 mg/m2, followed by interferon-alpha at the inoculation sites 2 days later) was administered q3wks. In the combination setting, an ICI was administered with each cycle. Patients A002 and 02-003 received Bria-IMT as monotherapy. Patients 06-005 and 06-007 received Bria-IMT in combination with an ICI.       Results: Median pt age of 65 (range 58-70). All pts had ≥1 HLA match with SV-BR-1-GM. Significant CNS tumor regression was observed in all pts. Pt A002 (ER+/PR+, HER2-) received 6 cycles, achieving an 83% reduction in breast lesions. ~3 months after the last cycle, imaging revealed the onset of multiple brain metastases and recurrence of right breast lesions. Following 3 additional cycles, marked measurable regression in both brain metastases and breast lesions was noted.  Pt 02-003 (ER-/PR-, HER2 1+ (IHC)) received 5 cycles and observed a 60% reduction (5mm ->2mm) in a left parietal periventricular lesion, and complete resolution (CR) of a left parietal lobe lesion. Pt 06-005 (ER+/PR-, HER2 1+(IHC)) demonstrated a 56% (9mm -> 4mm) reduction in the thickness of a dural lesion overlying the left anterior temporal lobe after 6 cycles of SV-BR-1-GM + ICI (pembrolizumab). After 2 additional cycles of SV-BR-1-GM + ICI (retifanlimab) and 1 cycle of SV-BR-1-GM (ICI was skipped on final cycle due to grade 2 AE), patient achieved CR of a left orbital mass observed at baseline (24mm -> 0m). Circulating cancer-associated macrophage-like cells (CAMLs) varied throughout the treatment, with levels ranged from a baseline of 90 to 24 by Cycle 13. Pt 06-007 (ER-/PR-, HER2 1+ (IHC)) demonstrated significant reductions in CNS lesions after 3 cycles of SV-BR-1-GM + ICI (pembrolizumab): a 67% reduction in a right frontal lobe lesion, 29% in the right parietal, 30% in the right thalamus, and 67% in the right precentral gyrus lesions. CAML levels remained low throughout treatment.      Conclusions: This review consolidates evidence for the efficacy of the Bria-IMT regimen in CNS metastasis regression, both alone and with ICIs. The consistent regression seen across all breast cancer subtypes among heavily pretreated patients highlights the potential of SV-BR-1-GM in managing CNS metastasis. Ongoing trials will determine the full extent.  Citation Format: Sailaja Kamaraju, Blaise Bayer, Mingjin Chang, William Williams, Charles Wiseman, Giuseppe Del Priore. Efficacy of Bria-IMT regimen in inducing CNS metastasis regression [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(7_Suppl):Abstract nr CT204.

Abstract CT195: First-in-human phase 1 study of WEE1 inhibitor APR-1051 in patients with advanced solid tumors harboring cancer-associated gene alterations

Abstract Background: WEE1 tyrosine kinase plays a key role in cell cycle regulation and DNA damage responses, acting as a principal gatekeeper of the G1-S and G2-M cell cycle checkpoints. Thus, inhibition of WEE1 can result in high cyclin-dependent kinase 1 and 2 activities, leading to aberrant cell cycle progression. Increasing premature entry into mitosis and subsequent apoptosis via WEE1 inhibition is one potential approach to killing cancer cells effectively. APR-1051 is an orally bioavailable, highly potent, small molecule inhibitor of WEE1 that has demonstrated in vivo anti-proliferative activity in multiple cancer cell lines and high selectivity for WEE1 versus polo-like kinases 1, 2, and 3. Increased selectivity for WEE1 may reduce the myelosuppressive toxicity (e.g., limiting Grade 3 toxicities) reported with other WEE1 inhibitors. Methods: The primary aim of this multi-center, open-label Phase I study is to characterize the safety, dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), maximum tolerated dose (MTD)/maximum administered dose (MAD) and recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) of APR-1051 in patients with advanced solid tumors harboring cancer-associated gene alterations. Secondary objectives include evaluating the pharmacokinetic (PK) properties of APR-1051, assessing the effect of food on its PK, and its preliminary efficacy per RECIST version 1.1. The exploratory objective is to assess the pharmacodynamic effects of APR-1051. For dose escalation, an accelerated titration followed by a BOIN design will be utilized to determine the MAD/MTD. Upon completion of the dose escalation, two suitable doses and schedules of single-agent APR-1051 will be determined for further investigation in dose selection optimization. Key inclusion criteria are age at least 18 years with advanced solid tumor and cancer-associated gene alterations (e.g., amplification/overexpression of CCNE1 or CCNE2, deleterious mutations in FBXW7 or PPP2R1A), ECOG PS 0 or 1, and adequate organ function. Key exclusion criteria are cancer therapy within 3 weeks or at least 5 half-lives, prior radiation therapy at the target lesion except if evidence of disease progression, unresolved therapy-related AEs, investigational agent within 5 half-lives or 30 days of study drug, prior WEE1 inhibitor, CNS metastases or unstable involvement, secondary malignancies that are active and/or require therapy, and concomitant moderate/strong inhibitors/inducers of CYP3A4/5, MDR1, or BCRP. Up to 79 patients will be enrolled at 3 to 5 sites in the United States. Citation Format: Timothy A. Yap, Crystal Miller, David Stenehjem, Eric J. Brown, Mike Carleton, Nadeem Q. Mirza. First-in-human phase 1 study of WEE1 inhibitor APR-1051 in patients with advanced solid tumors harboring cancer-associated gene alterations [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(7_Suppl):Abstract nr CT195.

Abstract CT196: First-in-human phase 1/2a trial of a macrocyclic ATR inhibitor (ATRN-119) in patients with advanced solid tumors

Abstract Background: ATRN-119 is an orally bioavailable, potent, selective macrocyclic small molecule inhibitor of Ataxia Telangiectasia and Rad3- related (ATR) kinase. As the master regulator of DNA damage response (DDR), ATR orchestrates cellular response to DNA replication stress to preserve DNA replication fork integrity. Cancer cells with markedly increased oncogenic stress or dysfunctional DDR are more reliant on ATR for genome stabilization. Thus, inhibition of ATR can result in cancer cell-selective replication fork collapse and cancer cell death. Methods: This ongoing, first-in-human, multi-site phase 1/2a trial (NCT04905914) is investigating ATRN-119 safety and pharmacokinetic properties (primary objectives), preliminary efficacy in various solid tumors (secondary objective), and biomarker profile (exploratory objective). This study uses an open-label, standard 3+3 dose escalation and dose expansion study design. Key inclusion criteria include: advanced solid tumor, measurable disease (RECIST v1.1), tumor with at least 1 DDR mutation by next-generation-sequencing, at least 1 failed standard-of-care therapy, ECOG PS 0 or 1, and adequate organ function. Key exclusion criteria are cancer therapy within 4 weeks or at least 5 half-lives, unresolved therapy-related AEs, investigational agent within 5 half-lives or 30 days of study drug, CNS metastases or unstable involvement, and concomitant treatment with strong CYP3A4 or CYP2D6 inhibitors or inducers. Results: This trial is currently enrolling at Dose level 5 (550 mg). Among 12 patients in the first four dose levels, the median age is 62 years (range: 48 to 79), where 67% (n=8) are female, 75% (n=9) are White, and 25% (n=3) are Black. The median number of prior treatments is 3 (range: 1 to 6, and 92% have received platinum-based chemotherapy). The majority of tumors, 75% (n=9), had a TP53 mutation. There have been no reports of dose-limiting toxicities, treatment-related serious adverse events (AE), and treatment-related AEs Grade 3 or higher in these cohorts. The three most commonly reported all-cause AEs are fatigue (33%, n=4), nausea (25%, n=3), and diarrhea (25%, n=3). Increasing exposure and maximum serum concentrations (Cmax) were observed by dose level. The half-life of ATRN-119 is ~5 hours. Two of 12 patients achieved stable disease (SD): one patient from Dose level 1 (50 mg) who progressed on Day 112 and one patient from Dose level 3 (200 mg) who remains on treatment as of Day 118 (data cut off date: January 2, 2024). Conclusion: In these early cohorts, once-daily oral ATRN-119 appears to be well tolerated with a manageable safety profile, exhibits near dose proportionality, and demonstrates disease stabilization warranting further investigation. Further studies to explore a twice-daily schedule are being considered. Citation Format: Fiona Simpkins, Amit Mahipal, Patricia LoRusso, Reva Schneider, Crystal Miller, David Stenehjem, Eric J. Brown, Mike Carleton, Joachim Gullbo, Nadeem Q. Mirza. First-in-human phase 1/2a trial of a macrocyclic ATR inhibitor (ATRN-119) in patients with advanced solid tumors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(7_Suppl):Abstract nr CT196.

Repurposing mebendazole against triple-negative breast cancer CNS metastasis.

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) often metastasizes to the central nervous system (CNS) and has the highest propensity among breast cancer subtypes to develop leptomeningeal disease (LMD). LMD is a spread of cancer into leptomeningeal space that speeds up the disease progression and severely aggravates the prognosis. LMD has limited treatment options. We sought to test whether the common anti-helminthic drug mebendazole (MBZ) may be effective against murine TNBC LMD. A small-molecule screen involving TNBC cell lines identified benzimidazoles as potential therapeutic agents for further study. In vitro migration assays were used to evaluate cell migration capacity and the effect of MBZ. For in vivo testing, CNS metastasis was introduced into BALB/c athymic nude mice through internal carotid artery injections of brain-tropic MDA-MB-231-BR or MCF7-BR cells. Tumor growth and spread was monitored by bioluminescence imaging and immunohistochemistry. MBZ was given orally at 50 and 100mg/kg doses. MBZ bioavailability was assayed by mass spectrometry. Bioinformatic analysis and migration assays revealed higher migratory capacity of TNBC compared to other breast cancer subtypes. MBZ effectively slowed down migration of TNBC cell line MDA-MB-231 and its brain tropic derivative MDA-MB-231-BR. In animal studies, MBZ reduced leptomeningeal spread, and extended survival in brain metastasis model produced by MDA-MB-231-BR cells. MBZ did not have an effect in the non-migratory MCF7-BR model. We demonstrated that MBZ is a safe and effective oral agent in an animal model of TNBC CNS metastasis. Our findings are concordant with previous efforts involving MBZ and CNS pathology and support the drug's potential utility to slow down leptomeningeal spread.

Integration analysis of single-cell transcriptome reveals specific monocyte subsets associated with melanoma brain and leptomeningeal metastasis.

Melanoma central nervous system (CNS) metastasis remains a leading cause of patient mortality, and the underlying pathological mechanism has not been fully elucidated, leading to a lack of effective therapeutic strategies. In this study, we conducted an integrated analysis of single-cell transcriptomic data related to melanoma brain metastasis (MBM) and leptomeningeal metastasis (LMM). We focused on differences of subset composition and molecular expression of monocytes in blood, primary tumor, brain metastases, and leptomeningeal metastases. Significant differences were observed among monocytes in blood, primary tumor, and different CNS metastatic tissues, particularly in terms of subset differentiation and gene expression patterns. Subsequent analysis revealed the upregulation of cell proportions of six monocyte subsets in brain metastasis and leptomeningeal metastasis. Based on differential gene analysis, four of these subsets exhibited increased expression of factors promoting tumor migration and survival, including AREG+ monocytes (AREG, EREG, THBS1), FABP5+ monocytes (SPP1, CCL2, CTSL), and CXCL3+ monocytes (CXCL3, IL8, IL1B). The proportions of TPSB2+ monocytes (IL32, CCL5) were notably elevated in melanoma leptomeningeal metastasis tissues. Pathway analysis indicated the activation of signaling pathways such as NOD-like receptors, NFκB, and Toll-like receptors in these metastasis-related subsets. Our findings elucidate that AREG+, FABP5+ and CXCL3+ monocytes are associated with brain metastasis and TPSB2+ monocytes are associated with leptomeningeal metastasis in melanoma, which may be contribute to the development of therapeutic strategies focusing on monocytes or cytokines for melanoma CNS metastasis.

Evaluating the Prognostic Variables for Overall Survival in Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis Of 29,366 Patients

Background: Scoring systems are a method of risk assessment used to stratify patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) and guide systemic therapy. The variables are weighed equally when calculating total score. However, the difference of even 1 positive predictor can change one's risk category and therapy. Objective: To compare the relative strength of association between predictive variables and overall survival (OS) in mRCC. Methods: A search of Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE) and Embase was conducted. Clinical studies, retrospective and prospective, were included if the association of at least 1 predictor and OS in patients with mRCC receiving first-line systemic therapy was evaluated. Meta-analysis was performed to generate pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs for OS for predictors with ≥ 5 included studies. Sensitivity analysis identified outlier heterogeneity and publication bias. Results: Sixty-six studies containing 29,366 patients were included. Meta-analysis indicated lung metastases, bone metastases, thrombocytosis, time to systemic therapy < 1 year, liver metastases, hypercalcemia, anemia, elevated neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, multiple metastatic sites, neutrophilia, poor Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) status, no previous nephrectomy, elevated lactate dehydrogenase, Fuhrman grade 3 or 4, central nervous system metastases, elevated C-reactive protein, and Karnofsky Performance Status < 80% were associated with significantly worse OS. The HRs varied from 1.34 to 2.76, representing heterogeneity in predictive strength. The effects of study heterogeneity and publication bias were minimal to moderate across all predictors. Conclusions: Based on the differences in pooled HRs, prognostic strength between the variables is likely not equivalent. Restructuring scoring models, through inclusion of other variables and usage of relative weighting, should be considered to improve accuracy of risk stratification.

Current treatment and novel insights regarding ROS1-targeted therapy in malignant tumors.

The proto-oncogene ROS1 encodes an intrinsic type I membrane protein of the tyrosine kinase/insulin receptor family. ROS1 facilitates the progression of various malignancies via self-mutations or rearrangements. Studies on ROS1-directed tyrosine kinase inhibitors have been conducted, and some have been approved by the FDA for clinical use. However, the adverse effects and mechanisms of resistance associated with ROS1 inhibitors remain unknown. In addition, next-generation ROS1 inhibitors, which have the advantage of treating central nervous system metastases and alleviating endogenous drug resistance, are still in the clinical trial stage. In this study, we searched relevant articles reporting the mechanism and clinical application of ROS1 in recent years; systematically reviewed the biological mechanisms, diagnostic methods, and research progress on ROS1 inhibitors; and provided perspectives for the future of ROS1-targeted therapy. ROS1 is most expressed in malignant tumours. Only a few ROS1 kinase inhibitors are currently approved for use in NSCLC, the efficacy of other TKIs for NSCLC and other malignancies has not been ascertained. There is no effective standard treatment for adverse events or resistance to ROS1-targeted therapy. Next-generation TKIs appear capable of overcoming resistance and delaying central nervous system metastasis, but with a greater incidence of adverse effects. Further research on next-generation TKIs regarding the localization of ROS1 and its fusion partners, binding sites for targeted drugs, and coadministration with other drugs is required. The correlation between TKIs and chemotherapy or immunotherapy in clinical practice requires further study.

Factors associated with overall survival in breast cancer patients with leptomeningeal disease (LMD): a single institutional retrospective review.

Breast cancer-related leptomeningeal disease (BC-LMD) is a dire diagnosis for 5-8% of patients with breast cancer (BC). We conducted a retrospective review of BC-LMD patients diagnosed at Moffitt Cancer Center from 2011 to 2020, to determine the changing incidence of BC-LMD, factors which are associated with the progression of BC CNS metastasis to BC-LMD, and factors which are associated with OS for patients with BC-LMD. Patients with BC and brain/spinal metastatic disease were identified. For those who eventually developed BC-LMD, we used Kaplan-Meier survival curve, log-rank test, univariable, and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model to identify factors affecting time from CNS metastasis to BC-LMD and OS. 128 cases of BC-LMD were identified. The proportion of BC-LMD to total BC patients was higher between 2016 and 2020 when compared to 2011-2015. Patients with HR+ or HER2 + BC experienced longer times between CNS metastasis and LMD than patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Systemic therapy and whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) was associated with prolonged progression to LMD in all patients. Hormone therapy in patients with HR + BC were associated with a delayed BC-CNS metastasis to LMD progression. Lapatinib treatment was associated with a delayed progression to LMD in patients with HER2 + BC. Patients with TNBC-LMD had shorter OS compared to those with HR + and HER2 + BC-LMD. Systemic therapy, intrathecal (IT) therapy, and WBRT was associated with prolonged survival for all patients. Lapatinib and trastuzumab therapy was associated with improved OS in patients with HER2 + BC-LMD. Increasing rates of BC-LMD provide treatment challenges and opportunities for clinical trials. Prospective trials testing lapatinib and/or similar tyrosine kinase inhibitors, IT therapies, and combination treatments are urgently needed.

Efficacy and survival outcomes of alectinib vs. crizotinib in ALK‑positive NSCLC patients with CNS metastases: A retrospective study.

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have transformed the treatment paradigm for patients with ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Yet the differential efficacy between alectinib and crizotinib in treating patients with NSCLC and central nervous system (CNS) metastases has been insufficiently studied. A retrospective analysis was conducted of clinical outcomes of patients with ALK-positive NSCLC and CNS metastases treated at the Shandong Cancer Centre. Based on their initial ALK-TKI treatment, patients were categorised into either the crizotinib group or the alectinib group. Efficacy, progression-free survival (PFS), intracranial PFS and overall survival (OS) were evaluated. A total of 46 eligible patients were enrolled in the present study: 33 patients received crizotinib and 13 patients received alectinib. The median OS of the entire group was 66.8 months (95% CI: 48.5-85.1). Compared with the patients in the crizotinib group, the patients in the alectinib group showed a significant improvement in both median (m)PFS (27.5 vs. 9.5 months; P=0.003) and intracranial mPFS (36.0 vs. 10.8 months; P<0.001). However, there was no significant difference in OS between the alectinib and crizotinib groups (not reached vs. 58.7 months; P=0.149). Furthermore, there were no significant differences between patients receiving TKI combined with radiotherapy (RT) vs. TKI alone with respect to mPFS (11.0 vs. 11.7 months, P=0.863) as well as intracranial mPFS (12.5 vs. 16.9 months, P=0.721). In the present study, alectinib exhibited superior efficacy to crizotinib for treating patients with ALK-positive NSCLC and CNS metastases, especially in terms of delaying disease progression and preventing CNS recurrence. Moreover, the results demonstrated that it might be beneficial to delay local RT for patients with ALK-positive NSCL and CNS metastases.

Abstract 6472: Response to PARP inhibitors in patients with breast cancer metastatic to the central nervous system

Abstract Background: Central nervous system (CNS) metastasis from breast cancer can be challenging to treat due to the limited blood brain barrier penetration of many systemic therapies. PARP inhibitors (PARPi) block single-strand DNA break repairs and have activity in cancers with homologous recombination repair deficiency; they are FDA approved for patients with metastatic HER2 negative breast cancer with germline BRCA1/2 mutations. While preclinical studies suggest that PARPi have CNS penetration, clinical data is limited. The goal of our study is to describe the clinical benefit of PARPi in patients with breast cancer CNS metastasis. Methods: This retrospective case series was conducted at three academic cancer centers (Johns Hopkins, Dana-Farber, and Duke) and included patients with the following criteria: (1) age≥18 years with a breast cancer diagnosis (any subtype); (2) diagnosis of parenchymal brain metastasis or leptomeningeal disease (LMD); and (3) received PARPi (olaparib, talazoparib) for CNS metastasis. Clinical and pathologic information were analyzed with descriptive statistics (median, range) and Kruskal-Wallis rank sum tests. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier curves with log-rank p-values. Results: Although this analysis includes one center’s experience, we will present a combined dataset (N = 45) at the main conference. 11 patients were identified at Johns Hopkins. 4 (36.4%) were Black and 6 (54.5%) were White; 6 (54.5%) had ER+HER2- disease and 5 (45.5%) had TNBC at time of brain metastasis; 5 (45.5%) had BRCA1 mutations, 5 (45.5%) had a BRCA2 mutations, and 1 patient (9%) had a BARD1 mutation; 7 (63.6%) had brain metastasis and 4 (36.4%) had LMD. Median lines of therapy prior to PARPi was 6 [1 - 11]; 8 patients (72.7%) had previous CNS radiation (5 SRS and 3 WBRT) and 3 (27.3%) had previous CNS surgery. On average, patients remained on PARPi for 5 months [0.5 - 66], and overall survival (OS) time from PARPi to death was 16 months [2 - 66]. Time on PARPi was 5 months [2 - 66] for patients with brain metastasis and 3 months [0.5 - 10] for those with LMD (p=0.22). Duration of PARPi and OS did not differ significantly between ER+HER2- and TNBC (p=0.74 and 0.69, respectively), BRCA 1 and 2 (p=0.78 and 0.72, respectively), or brain and LMD metastasis (p=0.22 and 0.91, respectively). Black patients had significantly shorter PARPi duration and survival than White patients (PARPi 2 vs. 8 months, p=0.028 and OS 4 vs 18 months, p=0.028). Prior CNS radiation was significantly associated with longer PARPi duration and survival (PARPi 5 vs 1 month, p=0.02 and OS 17 vs. 3 months, p=0.032). Prior CNS surgery was significantly associated with longer PARPi duration, but not overall survival (PARPi 18 vs 3 months, p=0.05 and OS 28 vs. 7 months, p=0.14). Conclusions: PARPi are associated with significant clinical benefit in patients with breast cancer CNS metastasis. Larger data series will help confirm these observations. Citation Format: Seoho Lee, Rani Bansal, Melissa E. Hughes, Amanda E. Van Swearingen, Heather N. Moore, David O. Kamson, Solmaz Sahebjam, Greg Kirkner, Anna Gorfinkel, Sarah Sammons, Nancy U. Lin, Carey Anders, Cesar A. Santa-Maria. Response to PARP inhibitors in patients with breast cancer metastatic to the central nervous system [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 6472.

Abstract 5949: The clinical dual KRASG12C inhibitor FMC-376 has demonstrated potential as both a monotherapy and in combination for the treatment of patients with KRASG12C mutation positive NSCLC

Abstract KRAS, a membrane-associated guanosine triphosphatase (GTPase), is the most frequently mutated oncogene in cancer with activating mutations occurring in approximately 25% of NSCLC. Of these, KRASG12C occurs in approximately 14% of adenocarcinomas and in 0.5 to 4% of squamous NSCLCs. This mutation impairs GTPase activity and GTP-hydrolysis leading to an increase in the active, GTP-bound (ON), state. KRAS was long considered undruggable until the recent discovery of inhibitors that bind the GDP-bound, inactive (OFF) state of KRASG12C. The most clinically advanced of these first-generation molecules have demonstrated clinical response rates of 37-43% and 6 to 7-month progression-free survival in patients with KRASG12C positive NSCLC. While significant, a majority of cancers do not respond, and acquired resistance is common. FMC-376 is a next-generation dual inhibitor of both the ON and OFF states of KRASG12Cwith the potential to deliver improved outcomes as both a monotherapy and in combination, for patients with KRASG12C positive NSCLC. FMC-376 was discovered through the FrontierTM platform, which integrates chemoproteomics, machine-learning, and covalent fragment-based drug discovery. The potential for FMC-376 in the treatment of patients with KRASG12C mutant NSCLC has been assessed in a broad panel of NSCLC PDX models representing settings of sotorasib/adagrasib resistance, in a model of NSCLC CNS-metastasis and in combination with an immune checkpoint inhibitor. The dual ON + OFF state mechanism of action of FMC-376 is highly active across a panel of NSCLC CDX and PDX models, including those that carry co-mutations that are associated with both primary and acquired resistance to the OFF-state inhibitors adagrasib and sotorasib in NSCLC. These drivers of resistance include activating mutations of receptor tyrosine kinases (e.g. EGFR, MET, etc.), co-mutations including KEAP1 and adaptive resistance due to release of negative feedback control. Evaluation of FMC-376 in models where EGFR signaling is induced by EGF demonstrated rapid and durable target engagement in contrast to both sotorasib and adagrasib which show decreased effectiveness after EGF stimulation. As a result, FMC-376 is highly effective in NSCLC PDX models that have EGFR and MET upregulation. In addition, 27-42% of patients with KRASG12C positive NSCLC present with CNS metastasis. FMC-376 is highly active in an intracranial NSCLC model of CNS-metastasis, resulting in tumor regression. Furthermore, FMC-376 has demonstrated activity in combination with an anti-PD-1 mAb in a KRASG12C mutant mouse syngeneic tumor model. Together, these data demonstrate the potential of FMC-376, a next-generation clinical stage dual inhibitor of ON and OFF state KRASG12C, for the treatment of patients with KRASG12C mutant NSCLC as well as other KRASG12C positive tumors. Citation Format: Yan Wang, Allison Roberts, Philamer Calses, Richard M. Neve, Jocelyn Staunton, Kevin R. Webster. The clinical dual KRASG12C inhibitor FMC-376 has demonstrated potential as both a monotherapy and in combination for the treatment of patients with KRASG12C mutation positive NSCLC [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 5949.

Abstract 7569: Characterizing pathways for metastasis of retinoblastoma in forebrain organoids

Abstract Retinoblastoma (Rb) is a childhood cancer of the eye, which usually presents in children under the age of five. When detected early, Rb has favorable prognosis in developed countries, but metastasis into the central nervous system (CNS) through the optic nerve correlate with a high mortality rate. Even if detected early, the available harsh and unspecific treatments can cause serious side effects, and enucleations are still performed frequently. There is still uncertainty regarding the mechanism for metastasis into the central nervous system. We performed bioinformatic analysis of single cell sequencing data for retinoblastoma, retinal tissues, optic nerve, and brain, to identify potential pathways and cell-cell communications fostering Rb invasion into the optic nerve and brain. Our analysis revealed several potential metastatic drivers, including immune modulation involving MIF, secreted by the Rb cells, as well as cell-adhesion pathways promoting a change in cellular phenotype. Given that animal models do not faithfully recapitulate human Rb initiation and progression, we developed a novel human iPSC-derived forebrain organoid model to investigate mechanisms of Rb CNS metastasis. Microinjections of GFP-labelled Rb cells allow to track growth and spread. In this fully human model including microglial cells, we can, for the first time, study the Rb forebrain interactions and pathways involved. RNA-seq analysis of Rb cells growing in forebrain organoids shows increased activity in neuron projection development and neuron migration, overlapping with the observed phenotype switch of invading Rb. Together, we present a novel iPSC-derived human forebrain model to monitor growth and spread of metastatic Rb, and describe new pathways involved in invading and metastasizing Rb. Citation Format: Yulia Shtanko, Sara Rodriguez, Benjamin Schachner, Emily Adis, Samantha McLaughlin, Sebastian Borges, James Dollar, Ashley Zuniga, Gabriela Quintana, Sofia Lopez, Dawn Owens, Chloe Moulin, Steffanie Braun, Gulum Yenisehirli, Daniel Pelaez, J. William Harbour, Stefan Kurtenbach. Characterizing pathways for metastasis of retinoblastoma in forebrain organoids [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 7569.

Impact of central nervous system metastasis after complete resection of lung adenocarcinomas harboring common EGFR mutation – A real-world database study in Japan: The CReGYT-01 EGFR study

ObjectivesTo clarify the impact of central nervous system (CNS) metastasis on performance status (PS) at relapse, on subsequent treatment(s), and on survival of patients with lung adenocarcinoma harboring common epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation. MethodsWe conducted the multicenter real-world database study for patients with radical resections for lung adenocarcinomas between 2015 and 2018 at 21 centers in Japan. EGFR mutational status was examined at each center. ResultsOf 4181 patients enrolled, 1431 underwent complete anatomical resection for lung adenocarcinoma harboring common EGFR mutations. Three-hundred-and-twenty patients experienced disease relapse, and 78 (24%) had CNS metastasis. CNS metastasis was significantly more frequent in patients with conventional adjuvant chemotherapy than those without (30% vs. 20%, P = 0.036). Adjuvant chemotherapy did not significantly improve relapse-free survival at any pathological stage (adjusted hazard ratio for stage IA2–3, IB, and II-III was 1.363, 1.287, and 1.004, respectively). CNS metastasis did not affect PS at relapse. Subsequent treatment, mainly consisting of EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), could be equally given in patients with or without CNS metastasis (96% vs. 94%). Overall survival after relapse was equivalent between patients with and without CNS metastasis. ConclusionThe efficacy of conventional adjuvant chemotherapy may be limited in patients with lung adenocarcinoma harboring EGFR mutations. CNS metastasis is likely to be found in practice before deterioration in PS, and may have little negative impact on compliance with subsequent EGFR-TKIs and survival after relapse. In this era of adjuvant TKI therapy, further prospective observational studies are desirable to elucidate the optimal management of CNS metastasis.

Furmonertinib for EGFR-mutant advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a glittering diamond in the rough of EGFR-TKI.

The third-generation EGFR-TKIs, such as osimertinib, aumolertinib, and furmonertinib, have been recommended as the preferred treatment for EGFR-mutant advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Among them, furmonertinib shows several advantages in terms of clinical efficacy. Firstly, compared to osimertinib and aumolertinib, furmonertinib was the first EGFR-TKI with median progression-free survival (mPFS) of over 20.0m (20.8m) for advanced NSCLC with classical EGFR-mutations. Furthermore, furmonertinib achieved a mPFS of 18.1m in advanced NSCLC with unfavorable prognostic factors, such as the 21 L858R mutation and central nervous system (CNS) metastasis, which is unrivalled by osimertinib. Secondly, furmonertinib is the only FDA-approved EGFR-TKI for breakthrough therapy in newly-diagnosed advanced NSCLC with EGFR ex20ins mutation. Thirdly, the relatively longer mPFS of 20.8m was observed in furmonertinib compared to osimertinib and aumolertinib (15.2m and 15.3m) in EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC with CNS metastases. More importantly, the efficacy of furmonertinib increases within the dose range of 80-240mg per day. Finally, furmonertinib can be an optional treatment for advanced NSCLC patients who develop resistance to osimertinib or aumolertinib. In conclusion, furmonertinib may be a glittering star in the field of EGFR-TKI, which requires further exploration and expansion.